Tag Archives: Dewey & LeBoeuf

Unfinished Business Doctrine in NY

I wrote blogs last year about the unfinished business doctrine as applied to defunct law firms.  To summarize: I am strongly against it, both on legal grounds and on practical, economic grounds. Now we await a major decision in the … Continue reading

Posted in Steve's Blog | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Unfinished Business Doctrine in NY

Dewey, the Unfinished Business Doctrine, and Judicial Vindication!

In July 2012, I wrote two blog pieces about a disturbing and growing problem: the claims of defunct law firms and their bankruptcy trustees to grab the fees earned by other law firms where the defunct firms’  attorneys had migrated … Continue reading

Posted in Steve's Blog | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Dewey, the Unfinished Business Doctrine, and Judicial Vindication!

Dewey & LeBoeuf — Continued

A few additional notes on the matter I blogged about last week: the efforts of the CRO in the Dewey bankruptcy to seek profits realized by those law firms that took in departing Dewey partners and completed work that began … Continue reading

Posted in Steve's Blog | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Dewey & LeBoeuf — Continued

Dewey & LeBoeuf, TDRPC 1.15, Fiduciary Duty, Contract and Equity

Earlier this year, I posted an article on our FB account (which, when I trace it down, I will note here) about the trustee in a law firm bankruptcy winning its assertion that departed partners of the defunct law firm … Continue reading

Posted in Steve's Blog | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Dewey & LeBoeuf, TDRPC 1.15, Fiduciary Duty, Contract and Equity